Translate

Tuesday, 22 May 2012

An Overlook of the world Prometheus Is Entering

'Prometheus' is one the most anticipated films of 2012, with thousands of fans awaiting Ridley Scott's return to the world of science fiction, with the film that for months he claimed was not an 'Alien' prequel, but we all knew it was, and then he confirmed that indeed, it was. The trailers just scream 'Alien', and it has been a long time since the final 'Alien' movie (not including the AVP franchise), what can we expect from this movie? Whatever happens inevitably leads to the events in 'Alien' in someway or another. Will we find out more about that mysterious crashed alien ship? Will we find out where the Xenomorphs come from? Will we see any Xenomorphs? These are all questions that 'Alien' fans will have in mind before seeing 'Prometheus' next month. This blog entry is all about the films set after the upcoming 'Prometheus', and the world that this movie in now entering. Warning, this entry contains spoilers from across the whole franchise, so you have been warned, but in all honesty, you should have seen all these by now.

What happens in 'Prometheus' directly leads to the events in Ridley Scott's 1979 'Alien'. 'Alien' is about a commercial towing spaceship called the Nostromo, which at the time is on a return trip from Thedus to Earth, hauling a refinery and twenty million tons of mineral ore, and carrying seven crew members in stasis. The crews stasis is disrupted by an emergency transmission of unknown origins from a nearby planetoid. Upon investigation the crew discovers a derelict alien spaceship. The same spaceship we see in the 'Prometheus' trailer. The films revolves around the main protagonist Ellen Ripley (Sigourney Weaver), the film was a huge financial and critical success. Ridley Scott managed to reinvent the whole world of science fiction with this movie. There are particular aspects of the film that instantly make it recognizable to the masses, these being the egg and facehuggers (the eight legged, tailed parasite that attaches itself to the victims face and lays an embryo in their throat) and the chestburster which grows up to become the alien/Xenomorph. The scene where the chestburster forces itself through Kane's (John Hurt) chest is one of the most iconic scene in sci fi. At the time it was terrifying, along with the end resulting alien itself. It was such a brutal entry into the world for the creature that it left audiences stunned. The Xenomorph itself is iconic for its mouth within a mouth and its acid for blood, it's almost as if everything about this creature can kill you. It was just so strange to comprehend a creature with concentrated acid for blood, nothing like it had been seen before. The marketing line "In space, no one can hear you scream" describes the exact tone of the movie, because the crew are completely alone, trapped in the middle of space with no chance of a rescue, fighting against a creature they know nothing about (which is more than capable of killing every one of them).

'Alien' instantly threw Sigourney Weaver into Hollywood fame, making her a household name, it also opened the doors for a whole new world of science fiction, along with its own mass media franchise, stretching from numerous movie sequels, to toys, games and books. Although Ridley Scott did not return to do the sequel, they managed to find someone more than capable of handling the task.

In 1986 James Cameron (Avatar and Titanic) took the helm and brought us 'Aliens', which is personally, my favourite film of the franchise. The films continues the story of Ellen Ripley, who at the beginning of the film, has been in stasis for 50 years. She awakens to find her world completely changed, and that colonists have been placed on LV-426 (the name now given to the planetoid). She faces many problems from the start, including having to deal with the aftermath of destroying the Nostromo in order to destroy the Xenomorph. When the company loses contact with LV-426, Ripley along with a squad of colonial marines are sent in to investigate what has happened. Upon arrival they discover that the colonists must have encountered the alien spaceship that Ripley had warned them about. Following the success of 'The Terminator' in 1984, which brought Cameron into the line light as an action director, 'Aliens' was given the green light, along with a $18 million budget. Cameron brings a different tone to the franchise, instead of Ridley Scott's horror motif, Cameron gives in a sense of action and adventure. Basically he takes the first movie, throws in a hundred more Xenomorphs, and marines with big rifles, what more could we ask for? The story is good, the acting is good, the effects are great! The Xenomorphs were created by using a mixture of costumes, puppets and miniatures. A lot of work went into making them as realistic as possible; changes had to be made in order to make the alien more durable, they believed if they kept the exact same design as in the first movie, then the head piece would split through too much movement. The scenes involving the Alien Queen were the most difficult to film (according to the staff). This is because a life-sized mock-up was created by Stan Winston's company in the United States to see how it would operate. Once the testing was complete, the crew working on the queen flew to England and began work creating the final version, which stood fourteen feet tall! It was operated using a mixture of puppeteers, control rods, hydraulics, cables and a crane above to support it. Two puppeteers were inside the suit operating its arms, and sixteen were required to move it. All sequences involving the queen were filmed in-camera with no post-production manipulation, which is truly a marvelous achievement. Even today the queen still stands up against many CGI monsters made for movies, this proves that there is still a place for real, hand made props in the world of film. The fact that the whole thing was hand operated without the help of post-production editing to make it look good, is just brilliant!

With 'Aliens' being so different to its predecessor, it was well received by critics (many believing it to be better) and it was also a financial hit, with a total box office of $131 million. Even today it is classed as one of the greatest sci fi movies ever made, and possibly the biggest achievement for this movie is the fact that it managed to surpass 'Alien' which was already a classic and had left really big boots for Cameron to fill on this job.

Then it begins to go downhill a bit, in 1992 with 'Alien 3', it was the debut of director David Fincher, who instantly had a huge challenge ahead of film, following great directors like Scott and Cameron. I do actually like this movie, but it's a massive step down from 'Aliens'. The story begins with an ejected pod from the Colonial Marine spaceship Sulaco from 'Aliens' crash-landing on a refinery/prison planet, killing everyone aboard with the exception of Lieutenant Ellen Ripley. Unknown to Ripley, an Alien egg was aboard the ship. It is born in the prison and begins a killing spree. The prison has about 20 inmates, each one either a murderer or a rapist, and each has taken on religion and an oath of celibacy (so Ripley's presence there disturbs the peace among the inmates). It tries to go back to the horror theme from 'Alien', but throughout the movie there are moment where you just feel bored, waiting for something to happen. The effects on the new Alien, the 'runner', do not stand up well today, especially next to the previous two films. Stan Winston, responsible for the creature effects in 'Aliens', was approached but was not available. Winston instead recommended Tom Woddruff, Jr and Alec Gulls, two former workers of his studio who had just started their own company, Amalgamated Dynamics. So they're to blame for the awful effects.

I did like the idea behind a different Alien, a look at what would happen if a facehugger attached itself to something other than a human, so it kind of takes the story in a new direction, providing Ripley with a new challenge. Evidently the franchise was supposed to end with 'Alien 3' because Ripley dies at the end of the movie, but in the words of James Cameron "Death is never certain in science fiction". Ironically, he said that about Sigourney Weaver's character in 'Avatar 2'.

The film had a very difficult production, with multiple screenwriters constantly getting involved and dropping out. Fincher was attached to the project very late on and he had very little time to prepare. The studio made the process agonizing for him, constantly getting involved and changing things without his consent. It received mixed reviews and was not very successful at the box office.

Apparently there had been other plans for 'Alien 3', and from the sounds of it, if they'd gone ahead and made that movie instead, then 'Alien 3 and 4' would have been so much better! Originally Brandywine Productions was approached by 20th Century Fox to create two more sequels. After going through several ideas, David Giler and Walter Hill, thr film series producers, "settles upon a complex two-part story that offered the underhanded Weyland-Yutani Corporation facing off with a militarily aggressive culture of humans whose rigid socialist ideology has caused them to separate from Earth's society" Sounds interesing doesn't it? Sigourney Weaver (Ripley) would only make a cameo appearance in the third film, with the lead going to Michael Biehn's Corporal Hick's from 'Aliens'. 'Aliens 4' would see the return of Ripley "in an epic battle with Alien warriors mass produced by the expatriated Earthlings". Weaver in particular liked the Col War metaphor and agreed to the smaller role feeling that her character would become "a burden to the story".

Weaver also agreed on being removed because she disagreed with the studio changes to 'Aliens', which removed scenes of Ripley's backstory that she considered crucial. 20th Century Fox didn't like the idea, but they agreed to finance the story, but asked if Hill and Giler could get Ridley Scott to direct. They also asked that the two films be shot back to back to lessen the production costs, However this proved to be difficult as Scott, though interested, was busy working on three films at the same time. William Gibson agreed to write the script. However, when a final screenplay (by David Twohy) was delivered to Fix president Joe Roth, he did not like the idea of Ripley being removed, declaring that "Sigourney Weaver is the centerpiece of the series" and Ripley was "really the only female warrior we have in our movie mythology". Weaver was then called, with a reported 45 million salary, plus a share of the box office receipts.

So we blame Joe Roth for scrapping what could have been two amazing movies, following the style of 'Aliens', instead we got a disappointing third movie (both for us and him I imagine) and an alright fourth movie, which brings us to the fourth installment.

In 1997 French filmmaker Jean-Pierre Jeunet gave us 'Alien Resurrection', from the outset it is better than 'Alien 3'. The film is set 200 years after 'Alien 3'. Ripley is cloned and an Alien queen is surgically removed from her body. The United Systems Military hopes to breed Aliens to study and research on the spaceship USM Auriga, using human hosts kidnapped and delivered to them by a group of mercenaries. The Aliens escape their enclosures, while Ripley and the mercenaries attempt to escape and destroy the Auriga before it reaches its destination, Earth. The story is very far fetched, but it's science fiction, anything can happen. There lot's of rewrites of the script, trying to work out how they could bring Ripley back from the dead, because the studio still wanted her as the protagonist. Originally the film was going to revolve around a clone of the character Newt from 'Aliens'. Joss Whedon (The Avengers Assemble) was brought in to write the film's script. He composed a thirty-page treatment surrounding this idea before being informed that the studio, though impressed with his script, now intended to base the story around Ripley. He had to rewrite the script in a way that would bring back the Ripley character, a task he found difficult. Whedon's initial screenplay had a third act on Earth, with a final battle for Earth itself. He wrote five versions of the final act, none of which ended up in the film. The whole idea of space mercenaries that Whedon used for this film is similar to that which turned into his short-lived series 'Firefly'.

Just like with the previous films, we are introduced to a new breed of Alien, this one is much stranger than all the rest. Apparently something happens in the cloning process that effects both Ripley and the Alien queen, resulting in the eventual birth of the Alien/Human Hybrid. The aim was to make it appear more human than Alien, and they achieve this in the face. I won't go into too much detail, you'll just have to watch it and make your own opinion. It;s an average movie, but it's definitely an improvement from 'Alien 3', but also it's no where as good as 'Alien' and 'Aliens'.

That's us done with the Alien Collection, I'm now going to talk about the extended universe of Alien, the crossover with the Predator franchise.Firstly we have 'Alien vs. Predator' in 2004, which shows an new idea of the Xenomorph's role in the universe, as hunt for the Predators. The film indicates that the Predators brought them to Earth in order to hunt them, and they used humans as hosts to breed them. The film itself isn't bad, the Aliens and the Predators are a perfect match for each other, however it's one of those movies where you leave thinking it could have been so much better. The main advantage of this film is the ending, which sets up for a chance of redemption in the franchise. In 2007, we were presented with 'Alien vs. Predator: Requiem', which follows the story from the end of the last movie. We are introduced to a new breed of Alien, the Pred-Alien, or the Abomination (it's obvious where that came from). Straight away there's a major gap in the story, and that is that at the end of the first movie, the Predators leave on a massive ship, with dozens of other Predators, and the chestburster then appears, but at the beginning of this movie, they're on a much much smaller ship, with only three Predators. Yet again it isn't a great movie, it doesn't quite work because it was supposed to be set in space sometime in the future, but the studio decided they wanted to conclude the story on Earth. Someone made a big mistake with these two film, they could have been really good, they're enjoyable, there's no doubt about that, but it's a wasted opportunity.

So 'Prometheus is entering a large franchise with some very good films to compete with, it does however have the advantage that it's main competition in the franchise was made in the 80s, because all the films made in the 90s and 20s, didn't quite live up the standard left for them. If 'Prometheus is as good as we're all hoping it will be (which I think it will be), it could revive the franchise, there has been talks for years about doing a fifth 'Alien' film. Before 20th Century Fox gave 'Alien vs. Predator' the greenlight, James Cameron had been working on a script for a fifth installment, with Ridley Scott to direct. It is believed that this became 'Prometheus' but there is also more talk that Sigourney Weaver has shown interest in returning for another film, continuing on from 'Alien Resurrection'. Apparently James Cameron actually liked 'Alien vs. Predator, rating it third out of the five 'Alien' movies out at the time, whereas Ridley Scott thought it killed the validity of the franchise.

So what does the future hold? The possibility of a fifth 'Alien' film, but also there has been talks of an 'Alien vs. Predator 3', which would follow the original plan of the second movie and be set in space in the future, possibly giving us more of a look at the Predators home planet, but we only get teased with in 'Alien vs. Predator: Requiem'. At the moment it seems unlikely that it will actually go ahead, but there is more activity going on on the other side of the water. Ever since 'Predators' came out in 2012, there has been talks of a sequel. The first movie was actually toned down in order to made a sequel possible. There's more news! With Arnold Schwarzenegger's return to acting, along with 'Terminator 5', he was apparently asked to star in 'Predator 3', which would be amazing! So if 'Prometheus' does as well as we expect it to, it may set the ball rolling on the rest of these sequels, which could potentially be really good for the world of sci fi.

So there we have it, a brief look at the world that 'Prometheus' is entering. Ridley Scott reinvented sci fi and cinema with 'Alien', can he bring back that same magic touch with this prequel? Let's hope so! As you can probably tell, I am extremely excited for this movie (hence why I spent ages writing this post), and it has all the right ingredients to make it one of the best films this year. It has some tough competition this year, with 'The Avengers Assemble' now the fourth highest grossing film of all time, and with the release of 'The Amazing Spider-man' and 'The Dark Knight Rises' very close on the horizon, we'll just have to wait and see how well it holds up.


Tuesday, 15 May 2012

Review of Dark Shadows

Dark Shadows is a 2012 American horror comedy film based on the 1966-1971 Gothic horror soap opera of the same name. The film is directed by Tim Burton and stars Johnny Depp as Barnabas Collins, a 200-year-old vampire, Eva Green as Angelique  Bouchard a vengeful witch who plots a vendetta against Barnabas and his family, and Michelle Pfeiffer as his cousin Elizabeth Collins Stoddard. When I first heard about this film, and that Tim Burton was directing it, I had a great feeling that finally the reputation of the vampire on the big screen had the chance to redeem itself (the Twilight films have more than sufficiently destroyed that).


I've never seen the TV series, so I went into the cinema with an open mind, and I can clearly conclude that Tim Burton has done a good job with this, it carries everything that makes Tim Burton films appealing. The film is by no means perfect, there's a lot that could have been done better. I'm going to start with the cast, as with everything Depp does, he was great as Barnabas Collins, you can tell that he studied the like of Christopher Lee in order to create his incarnation of the vampire. Which is obviously a good thing because that means he was mimicking the golden age of the vampire, back when they were played by some of the greatest actors of the time. Depp combines  his formula for comedy with the charming yet ferociousness nature of the vampire. When you also add in the fact that his character is from the 1700s, his mannerisms appear out of place in the 1970s, it is the perfect setting for a comedy, but it is important not to allow that to distract from the fact that a vampire is a deadly creature, that needs to feed, needs to kill. As for the rest of the cast, Eva Green is brilliant as the witch, she's sinister, sexy and cunning. Her and Depp would a good on screen pair. Helena Bonham Cater has a smaller role than she normally does in Burton's films, but she still makes herself known. Apart from Chloe Grace Moretz and Bella Heathcote, the rest of the cast is extremely average. Alice Cooper has a cool cameo in the film, it's quite funny how he looks exactly the same today as he did in the 70s (the guy has always looked old!). 


The film itself is good, flows pretty well (my only complaint is that it seems to rush through the prologue) and the music resembles that of 'Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street' (minus the musical film aspect of it), which works well in this. On the comedy side of things, it's funny, but it's not nearly as funny as it could be, and the laughs aren't long lasting. You find yourself laughing at Depp's character more than anything. The whole film as that particular look and feel that all Burton films have, and I strongly believe that this is one of his better pieces of work. The film is consistent throughout, everything about it is decent up until the end, where things start to become a bit ridiculous and border line stupid.


So overall, it's a good film, definitely worth seeing if you are a Tim Burton and Johnny Depp fan, but it's one of those ones that could have been done better. It isn't a big return to glory for vampires that i wanted, but it is definitely a good start; it's like the first step in a long journey to making vampires cool again. I'd give this film 7/10.



Thursday, 10 May 2012

What's Your Favorite American Pie Movie?

Just a quick post before I head off and get my hair destroyed by the barber college (why I decided to be a model for them is beyond me), I'm interested to see which out of all the 'American Pie' movies (including the direct to DVD ones) are your favorite. I'm not too fussed if you want to include 'American Reunion', I will be.

Here's my list of my favorite 'American Pie' films, ranking from 8 down to 1 (8 being the worst and 1 being the best).

8.American Pie Presents:The Naked Mile
7.American Pie Presents: Beta House
6.American Pie Presents: The Book Of Love
5.American Wedding
4.American Reunion
3.American Pie Presents: Band Camp
2.American Pie
1. American Pie 2

I'd love to see your opinions, comment on here, or on Facebook, even on Twitter if you so wish!

Wednesday, 9 May 2012

Review of American Reunion

American Reunion is a 2012 comedy film, written and directed by Jon Hurwitz and Hayden Schlossberg. It is the eighth installment of the American Pie film series overall, and the fourth theatrical release. The film includes all the cast members from the original three movies, just from knowing that I was very optimistic about it, knowing that it would be better than any of the direct to DVD releases. It is set thirteen years after the events of 'American Pie'. Warning, this review contains mild spoilers.

This was probably one of the most difficult films I've reviewed so far, because there's much I have to hold back so that I don't ruin the movie, but it's also difficult to get my views out without doing that. You'll understand what I mean if you go and see it.

I'm going to start by saying that it's brilliant to see the original cast back together. I thought they were going to miss out a few of the minor characters, but nope, they're all there. I was disappointed that not all the cast members got a lot of screen time, but when you put the whole thing in perspective, it's the same situation they had with 'American Wedding' in the fact that it would be difficult to write a story big enough and interesting enough to give so many cast members their own decently sized part.

It's a funny film, the laughs are consistent throughout, but the main problem I had with this film, is that the only thing that makes it feel like a true American Pie film, is the cast. By that I mean that this film may be funny, but there's no outrages scenes that would instantly come to mind if this film was brought up in conversation. With the first film we have the scene when Jim strips and in the second one when he glues his hand to his penis. These types of scenes are what made the franchise famous in the first place, it was crude, pushing boundaries of what was allowed to be shown on screen, even the direct to DVD releases had scenes like these ones, like in 'American Pie Presents: Band Camp when Matt Stifler gets an oboe stuck on his penis.The trademarks of the franchise are the outrages scenes that we all remember, and will probably never forget. Don't get me wrong, I really enjoyed this movie, but one of the most memorable scenes in my opinion, is in the trailer. There's very little that differentiates it from other comedies out there, apart from, like I said before, the cast. Other parts of the film is similar to its predecessors,  in the fact that the gang always manage to take a simple situation, and make it ridiculously complicated, with everything going wrong at every turning, and that's what I love about all the American Pie movies. They're so ridiculous, but it's always in a way that it makes you think "this could actually happen" kind of way, because a lot of the stuff that happens is just exaggerated versions of events that could happen to anyone.  

The story itself is actually quite good, it's not all about the reunion, the impending reunion merely brings all the cast members back home to East Great Falls and back together and it centralizes on how much there lives have changed since High School, and how some of them are having trouble adjusting to that life and how the relationships between the characters has changed now that they're older.  The reunion itself, acts almost in the same way prom did in the first film, it also acts as the point where they tie off loose ends from the story and they bring in all the characters that they haven't managed to fit in before that point in the film.

All in all the film is one massive blast from the past, if you aren't a fan of the movies, then there's a lot you won't understand about this one, because there are many references back to the first one especially, but if you are a fan, then there's a chance you'll love it. Like I said before, the main problem I have with it is that it doesn't feel like the old American Pies, and the jokes aren't really that fresh, but I would still recommend going to see it, because it's still a good film, it's really funny, and you'll fall in love with the earlier films again. It's definitely a film for you to see with your friends and enjoy yourself. It was a good way to go full circle with the cast and bring it all to an end, but I think it's time the story does end. Yes, they do leave it open for more sequels, but I think it's time they put it to bed, they were pushing it with making this one anyway. I'd give 'American Reunion' a 6.5/10.


Monday, 7 May 2012

What Is Your Top 10 Childhood Disney Movies?

At the request of a friend I have decided to do a second poll. This time about Disney films. Before I got started I realised that as you get closer to the current day, Disney films start appearing less and less like the Disney films I grew up with. For example, I love the Avengers, but I don't see it as a Disney film (Disney owns Marvel Studios). So I decided that we should all have a look back at what made our childhoods special, what characters have stayed with you over the years, and which ones you still watch on the TV every time they're on.

So here's my Top 10 Disney movies from my childhood...

10. Mary Poppins (1964)
9. The Santa Clause (1994
8. Treasure Planet (2002)
7. George of the Jungle (1997
6. Homeward Bound: The Incredible Journey (1993)
5. Monsters, Inc (2001)
4. The Jungle Book (1967)
3. Aladdin (1992)
2. Flubber (1997)
1. Toy Story (1995)

So there we have it, obviously there are so many others that I could include, it took me a while to narrow it down.I'm quite surprised that I didn't put Toy Story 2 in there to be honest, I may regret that later.

As usual comment either on the blog or on Facebook (you could even get in contact with me on Twitter!). I look forward to reading your Top 10.

Sunday, 6 May 2012

Review of Silent House


Silent House is a 2011 (released in the UK in 2012) independent horror film, directed by Chris Kentis and Laura Lau. The plot focuses on a young woman named Sarah (Elizabeth Olsen), who is terrorized in her family vacation home whilst she is there cleaning the place up with her father and uncle. The film is a remake of the 2012 Uruguayan film 'La casa muda' (The Silent House), which was allegedly based on an actual incident that occurred in a village in Uruguay in the 1940s. The films marketing was aimed at the fact that it was filmed in real time, and was edited so as to appear as a single continuous shot (similar to Alfred Hitchcock's 'Rope' in 1948).

Before I jump straight into this I am going to say that I am rubbish when it comes to watching horror flicks in the cinema, I'm fine when they're on the TV, but honestly, in the cinema I am a complete coward (has to be admitted). Obviously the best thing about this movie is that it was filmed to give the impression of real time, so as much of it as possible was filmed in one shot, which would be very difficult to do, not just in the case of filming, but it would be really tough of the actors, especially the lead role, in this case Olsen, because in any other movie, you'd do maybe a dozen or more takes, and they'd pick the best one, whereas in a scenario like this, nearly the whole film is one take, that's a lot of pressure and I think Olsen pulled it off fantastically. If she did slip up at any point she pulled it back and really sold it for me, she was excellent. Now back to the method of filming; I think the method of creating a sense of rel time worked really well, at first it looked a bit iffy because it looked very shaky as it followed Olsen around (it just looked like bad camera work), but as the film progresses you realise that it blends in with how the story is being told, and even something as simple as a shaky camera creates a sense of realism. Also the beauty of doing one continuous shot is that in order to preserve the realism, special effects are kept to a minimum (maybe even none at all), no CGI, just the right noises made at the right time. The whole thing is gritty, it's like all the modern computer work has been stripped back and has left nothing but a pure product of good acting and filming. It almost gives off the feeling of a found-footage movie, without the need for a running commentary to explain everything that is happening. So a wise choice by the directors on that one. It definitely creates a sense of realism which is difficult to create in a horror flick.

I've already mentioned how the acting is top notch, but that doesn't make a brilliant movie, in my opinion, it is the story that lets it down. It begins the way many horror films do, i.e. really slow, nothing much happening, and then slowly building up to something big. The problem is with this one, is that it just keeps building and building, an building, you keep anticipating a jump which doesn't happen! You'll get one decent jump scare (that's another thing, the atmosphere may build up a good scary vibe in the cinema, but the scares are all jump scares), and then you're left waiting for what feels like ages (which is surprising because it's quite a short film). Admittedly the story does pick up a bit near the end, it even takes a turn in a strange and slightly disturbing direction (honestly ' The Cabin In The Woods' didn't have a twist as good as this). By the end you don't quite know how to react to what you've just seen, you find yourself replaying the whole movie in your head trying to piece things together.

That's basically all I can say on this film without giving too much away. It was never going to a hugely successful film. It's good, in the sense that it looks good, and the acting's good, but the story does let it down, because even though it picks up near the end, there's a good chance it'll have lost some of its audiences interest by then. Basically if you're a film fan, and are interested in how films are made, then go check this one out, because the whole real time and one continuous shot method works well and it is a really interesting way to do it. It's the type of method that would only work with a horror. Like most independent movies, it wouldn't have had a huge budget, so this method of filming is a suitable substitute to pricey visual effects. It has a nice, gritty feel to it that can only be appreciated in the cinema. I'd give this film a 6.5/10.

I know that's a low rating, but like I said, if you're interesting in seeing different ways of filming and presenting a story on screen, then go check this film out. It's definitely worth your time.

Thursday, 3 May 2012

The Build Up to American Reunion

For years the original American Pie series has had a special place in my heart, because even though they weren't well received by critics, they have still managed to secure themselves in modern pop culture (for example, what teenager today doesn't know what the word 'milf' means?). I find the films extremely entertaining and I still laugh every time I watch them. So here's a quick overview of where it all started (I'm mostly going to talk about the original three movies, the ones that were released in the cinema). I am not going to go into depth about film (i.e. cast and story) because it would take forever for me to do that with all seven films. This post does contain very mild spoilers.

Our Journey begins 13 years ago...

American Pie (1999)
This is where it all started, written by Adam Hertz and was a directorial debut for brothers Paul and Chris Weitz. The film followers a group of students in their final year of high school, on a mission to get themselves laid  before they leave. The goal of getting laid at prom being the main goal. Like I said, I'm not going to go in depth with the story, but the film goes on with each of the characters trying their best to achieve their goal whilst inevitably encountering awkward and embarrassing situations. With memorable characters and scenes that are now embedded into the minds of thousands of teenagers, 'American Pie may not have been a critical success, but it was most certainly a box office success. The film took in a gross worldwide revenue pf $235,483,004, $132,922,000 of which was from international tickets. The success of this movie spawned two immediate sequels over the next few years and a series of direct to video releases.

American Pie 2 (2001)
The sequel to the loved 'American Pie' continues the story of the same four friends as they now adjust to life at college, believing that their luck will change now that they are older and more mature. As their summer break comes up they decide to rent a beach house and have a party. Throughout the movie they encounter more hilarious situations, most of which top those of the first movie. For example, the scene when Jim's masturbating and he uses glue instead of lube, is possibly the best scene across the whole franchise! The film got mixed reviews, this time because it lacked the originality of the first movie, which is to be expected with it being a sequel, but it is still the best received film of the series.

American Wedding (2003)
This sequel was the final of the series to make it to the big screen for what would turn out to be 9 years! It ties up the story of Jim and Michelle, going from meeting in the first movie, to dating at the end of the second movie, to finally getting married in this installment. Story wise, this varied the most from the theme of the original movie. The story itself doesn't revolve around the main characters obsessing with getting themselves laid, but they obsess with helping Jim give Michelle the wedding she wants. Their journey takes them from dance offs in a gay bar, to strippers dressed as french maids and police women duck taping someone to a chair. Naturally the gang faces many challenges on the way to organising the perfect wedding, some more ridiculous than others, and for once we even see a little bit of characters development (many will disagree, but I don't think characters development has been strong in any character apart from Jim). One main notable point about this film is the absence of particular characters from the previous two movies, most the absence of   'Oz' who had to be written out due to scheduling conflicts. The other characters were written out because the writers didn't believe that they couldn't make an interesting  enough story that could include such a large cast of characters including the new editions.

Now we make to the stuff that didn't make it to the big screen...

American Pie Presents: Band Camp (2005)
This first installment of a new series of American Pie movies follows the characters of Matt Stifler, the younger brother of Steve Stfler from the original series. The story follwers the younger Stifler as he gets himself into trouble and is made to attend band camp, where he plans to reveal all the dark naughty secrets of the campers, but in the process discovers more about himself and becomes more attached to his fellow campers. This is my personal favourite from the spin off series. I don't even know why, I guess it's just because it sticks in my head the most due to a number of memorable scenes (i.e. the scene with the oboe).

American Pie Presents: The Naked Mile (2006) 
This is the second installment of the spin off series and it includes a new cast, including a new Stifler (two new Stiflers), and follows the story of the younger Stifler being given free pass by his girlfriend to go out and explore his sexual needs. Him and his friends journey to visit possibly my favourite Stifer from the spin off, Dwight Stifler, played by Steve Talley. The films is filled with raunchy drinking parties, and the famous naked mile run which the film is named after. It's a funny enough film, not the strongest of the series, but it has some laughs, and each of the main characters goes away with his own awkward sexual encounter, one of which is exceptionally hilarious.

A horrible point to mention is that back in 2007, a 22 year old man called David Reid, from Manchester died when copying the binge drinking game called "last man standing" depicted in the movie.

American Pie Presents: Beta House (2007)
This installment follows the story of the young Eric Stfler, now going to college to join his older cousin Dwight, and it follows him and his new friends campaigning to complete a set amount of tasks in order to become 'betas'. Inevitably the house has a rival house called the 'geek' house and the two come to blows at the end in the famous (banned) 'Greek Olympiad'. It is funny, but ridiculous at the same time. I'm really not a fan of this one, it kind of feels like a low point because it just doesn't feel like 'American Pie', they could easily have made it its own film, but instead they slapped a Stifler on it, and released it as part of a well-liked franchise.

American Pie Presents: The Book Of Love (2009)
To date this is the final installment of the American Pie spin off series. With a completely new cast, the film was set 11 years after the events of 'American Pie', the whole film ties in a lot of aspects of the previous films, and in my opinion, is an improvement on its predecessor. It is still not a fantastic film, but it brings back some of those magical elements of the original films and takes it in a new direction. The end of the movie suggests that it was the kick start the series again. So far their is no word on whether or not this series will be continued.

One thing all of the movies have in common, is the appearance of Eugene Levy, better known as Jim's dad Noah Levenstein. He is the main factor that binds all of the movies and has acted as a mentor and councilor to the main characters all the way through.It becomes clear as the movies go on that he isn't the sexually naive father figure that we are introduced to int he first movie back in 1999. 

And finally we are here, the end product of many years anticipation...

American Reunion (2012)
Also known as 'American Pie 4' and 'American Pie: The Reunion', obviously I cannot review the film yet because I won't be seeing it until early next week. So what can we expect? Well we expect some of the former glory of the original movies with the return of the original cast, now much older, but none the wiser. If the films good enough, it may act as a revival of the series, giving the writers a chance to explore new areas involving troubles in the adult life. It could also revive the spin off series, since the final installment leaves it open to many possible story lines.

I really hope 'American Reunion' does justice to the franchise, it is the first of the series to make it to the big screen since 2003. Theoretically it should do really well, because not only will fans of the original films want to go and see it, but it will attract attention from the new generation of teenagers who maybe aren't as attuned to the series as the rest of us.

Well I hope you enjoyed this quick catch up on the 'American Pie' series, it's hard to believe that a film, named after a song released that summer, went on to become something to large and culturally accepted (and on that note, the soundtrack to these movies across the board is amazing! There is even a cameo from Blink 182 in the first movie!). Thank you American Pie, we love you.

Look forward to my next to 'build up' installments where I explore the original 'Spiderman' trilogy and the history of the 'Batman' franchise in preparation for 'The Amazing Spiderman' and 'The Dark Knight Rises'.